Hong Kong (CNN) -- Nearly a third of the world's
economic output will come from countries facing "high" to "extreme"
risks from the impacts of climate change within 12 years, according to a
new report.
The Climate Change Vulnerability Index,
an annual report produced by UK-based risk analysis firm Maplecroft,
found that climate change "may pose a serious obstacle to sustainable
economic growth in the world's most commercially important cities."
The index ranked the
vulnerability of the world's countries, and the 50 cities deemed most
economically important, to the impacts of climate change, by evaluating
their risk of exposure to extreme climate events, the sensitivity of
their populations to that exposure and the adaptive capacity of
governments to respond to the challenge.
It said the combined GDP
of the 67 countries classed as facing "high" or "extreme" risks was
projected to nearly triple from $15 trillion to $44 trillion by 2025 --
meaning nearly a third of the global economy would be coming under
increasing threat from extreme climate-related events. It projected the
population of those countries -- currently estimated at more than 4.5
billion -- could exceed 5 billion by 2025.
The index's findings bore
particularly bad news for Bangladesh, which topped both lists, with its
capital, Dhaka, ranked the most vulnerable city due to its exposure to
threats such as flooding, storm surge, cyclones and landslides, its
susceptible population and weak institutional capacity to address the
problem.
Along with the
Bangladeshi capital, the four other cities categorized as facing
"extreme risk" from climate change impacts were also located in Asia --
Mumbai, Manila, Kolkata and Bangkok -- and projected to be centers of
high economic growth.
"The combined GDP in
these cities is forecast to almost triple from US$275 billion to US$804
billion by 2025, representing the greatest combined growth in any of the
risk categories," said the report, released Wednesday. The figures, it
said, underlined the way in which "cities with some of the biggest
economic growth potential are among those with the greatest
vulnerability to climate change."
Greenpeace's chief
scientist Doug Parr said the report highlighted "just how urgent the
need is for the international community to tackle climate change."
"Without a binding global agreement the economic and social impact of
global warming will be devastating," he said.
"It would be morally
negligent for countries with large emissions to ignore the mounting
evidence of the impact global warming that shows that some of the
poorest nations on the planet will be hit hardest, while those nations
who are seeing the first signs of economic growth after years of
stagnation will see those gains washed away by consequences of global
warming."
On a national level,
many global growth markets were extremely vulnerable to climate change,
the report said, with important markets such as Nigeria, India,
Pakistan, Vietnam and the Philippines all joining Bangladesh in the
"extreme risk" category.
Bangladesh was followed
on the list of most vulnerable countries by Guinea-Bissau, Sierra Leone,
Haiti, South Sudan, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Cambodia,
the Philippines and Ethiopia.
The vulnerability of
many African countries -- which accounted for 14 of the 20 most at-risk
nations -- was partly due to their natural susceptibility to extreme
climate-related events such as floods, droughts, fires, storms or
landslides. But it was also a consequence of the vulnerability of the
population, and the inadequacies of existing infrastructure to adapt to
or tackle the problem, due to weak economies, governance, education and
healthcare.
Countries in south and
southeast Asia, which accounted for one-third of all "extreme" risk
nations, were likely to face an increased risk of severe flooding due to
projected changes in seasonal rainfall. These would also increase the
likelihood of summer droughts, and in turn, declining crop yields. The
most susceptible populations in these areas were in areas with high
levels of poverty, and where large populations had clustered on marginal
land such as flood plains or coastal regions in cyclone-prone areas.
While the majority of
small, developing, island nations faced extreme levels of exposure to
climate-related events, their populations and infrastructures were
deemed less "sensitive," and were therefore generally not considered to
be at "extreme" risk overall. One exception was Haiti, where poor
healthcare access, weak infrastructure, high levels of poverty and an
over-reliance on agriculture placed the country into the "extreme"
category.
Maplecroft's head of
environment, James Allan, said that identifying where the risks of
climate change were going to be highest was "now an imperative for both
business and governments."
"Framing the risks in
economic terms makes the issue harder to ignore, especially for
business, and it may prompt better preparedness planning," he said.
"Nothing prompts corporate or political action faster than having to
deal with the aftermath of an extreme climate event."
London and Paris were
the only two cities ranked as "low risk," while Iceland, followed by
Norway and Ireland, were the least vulnerable countries.
In September, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its latest assessment report,
a benchmark study on global warming involving the efforts of nearly
1,000 researchers around the world. It expressed widespread, rising
confidence among scientists the climate is warming, that humans are
responsible for at least half of the increase in temperatures since the
1950s.
cnn.com
30/10/13
No comments:
Post a Comment
Only News